Assessing the Identity of Black Indians in Louisiana: A Quantitative and Qualitative Analysis

Posted in Dissertations, History, Louisiana, Media Archive, Native Americans/First Nation, Social Work, United States on 2012-02-20 02:34Z by Steven

Assessing the Identity of Black Indians in Louisiana: A Quantitative and Qualitative Analysis

Louisiana State University
May 2004
193 pages

Francis J. Powell

A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment of the Doctor of Philosophy In The School of Social Work

This study shows the existence of Black Indians in Louisiana and investigates whether differences exist between Black Indians who are members of officially recognized tribes and those who do not have any type of recognition. The study examined if a relationship exist between tribal recognition and ethnic identity, subjective well-being, and social support. A cross-sectional survey design was used. Semi-structured interviews were conducted to obtain qualitative data. The sample consisted of 60 participants. 30 were from recognized tribal groups and 30 were from non-recognized tribal communities.

The study specifically examined variables related to the perceptions of Black Indians in Louisiana to see if this group perceives themselves to be Black, Indian, or both. The independent variable included demographic characteristics and tribal designation. The dependent variables were ethnic identity, subjective well-being and social support.
 
Results showed that Black Indians in recognized groups had higher levels of Native American identity when compared to their levels of African American identity (p< .01). There were no significant differences in the levels of Native American identity when compared with the African American identity among the non-recognized samples (p< .342). Differences did emerge with respect to income, age, and tribal designation. Results indicated that those Black Indians in recognized tribes were significantly more likely to be younger with higher annual incomes than those Black Indians in non-recognized groups (p < .01).
 
There were no significant differences between the two groups for the variables social support and subjective well-being. Findings imply that “race”, as a social construct, is designed by arbitrary categories that are inconsistent with ethnic heritage or cultural identity development.

Table of Contents

  • ACKOWLEDGEMENTS
  • ABSTRACT
  • 1 INTRODUCTION
    • Mixture of African and Native Americans
    • Historical Indian Tribes in Louisiana
    • Purpose of the Study
    • Importance of the Study
    • Operational Definition of Key Concepts
    • Legal Definitions and Racially Mixed People
  • 2 REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE
    • Empowerment Approach Theory
    • African American Perspective
      • The Black Experience
      • Church and Family
    • Racial Identity Theories
    • Native Americans
      • Precontact
      • Postcontact
      • Cultural Beliefs
      • Indian Identity
      • Who is an Indian?
    • Historiography of Southern Race Relations
    • Theoretical Perspectives on Biracial Individuals
    • Theoretical Perspectives on Ethnicity and Culture
    • Measuring Ethnic Identity
    • Life Satisfaction and Subjective Well-Being
      • Well-Being and Social Support among African Americans
      • Well-Being and Social Support among Native Americans
    • Social Support Theory
    • Literature Review Summary
  • 3 METHODOLOGY
    • Conceptual Framework
    • Combining Quantitative and Qualitative Methods
    • Research Design
    • Population and Samples
    • Instrumentation
    • Data Collection Procedure
    • Data Analysis
      • Research Hypothesis
    • Definition of Key Concepts
    • Protection of Human Subjects
    • Purpose of the Research Study
    • Major Research Questions
    • Qualitative Research Process
      • Research Design
      • Instrument
      • Data Collection
  • 4 DESCRIPTION AND ANALYSIS OF QUANTITATIVE SAMPLE
    • Sample Characteristics
    • Univariate Analysis
      • Objective One
        • Recognition
        • Gender
        • Income
        • Age
        • Education
      • Objective Two
      • MEIM (Ethnic Identity and Affirmation, Belonging, Commitment – African American)
      • MEIM (Ethnic Identity and Affirmation, Belonging, Commitment – Indian)
      • Well-Being (Life Satisfaction and Social Status)
      • Social Support
      • Emotional Support (family)
      • Socializing (family)
      • Practical Assistance (family)
      • Financial Assistance (family)
      • Advice/Guidance (family)
      • Emotional Support (friends)
      • Socializing (friends)
      • Practical Assistance (friends)
      • Financial Assistance (friends)
      • Advice/Guidance (friends)
    • Bivariate Analysis
      • Objective Three
  • 5 DESCRIPTION AND ANALYSIS OF QUALITATIVE SAMPLES
    • Sample Characteristics
    • Dual Cultural Identity
    • Racial Dissonance
    • Racism
    • Marginalization
    • Chapter Summary
  • 6 QUANITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE FINDINGS: SUMMARY, DISCUSSION, IMPLICATIONS, LIMITATIONS
    • Demographic Variables
    • Ethnic Identity
    • Well-Being (Life Satisfaction and Social Status)
    • Qualitative Findings
    • Implication of Social Work Practice
    • Implication of Social Work Education
    • Limitation of the Study
    • Direction for Future Research
  • REFERENCES
  • APPENDIX
    • A. MANDATORY CRITERIA FOR FEDERAL ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
    • B. RESEARCH STUDY PROJECT INSTRUMENTS
    • C. QUALITATIVE INTERVIEW GUIDE
  • Qualitative Interview Guide
  • VITA

Read the entire dissertation here.

Tags: , , ,