For example, the level of discordance between self-reports of Native American youth and the racial designations made by child welfare was 90% at Time 1; youthā€“child welfare discordance was even higher (96.1%) for multiracial youth.

When surveying youth in foster care, almost one in ļ¬ve changed their racial self-identiļ¬cation over a one-year period. This reļ¬‚ects a higher rate of change over a shorter period of time than has been reported in the literature for adolescents in the general public. In contrast, the increased likelihood for Native American and multi-racial youth in the current study to change their racial categorization mirrors ļ¬ndings from earlier studies involving similarly-aged youth; the ļ¬ndings also suggest that a signiļ¬cant proportion of Hispanic youth change their ethnic categorization as well. Findings from the current study further highlight high rates of discordance between the racial and ethnic self-identiļ¬cation of Native American, Hispanic and multi-racial youth, and how agencies (school and child welfare) categorize them. For example, the level of discordance between self-reports of Native American youth and the racial designations made by child welfare was 90% at Time 1; youthā€“child welfare discordance was even higher (96.1%) for multiracial youth. Similarly, Hispanic youth were misclassiļ¬ed by the child welfare system over half of the time, and by school approximately one-third of the time.

Jessica Schmidt, et. al., ā€œWho am I? Who do you think I am? Stability of racial/ethnic self-identification among youth in foster care and concordance with agency categorization,ā€ Children and Youth Services Review, Volume 56, September, 2015, 65. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2015.06.011. Also here.

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,